V. A Trip to Sergiyev Posad

Sergiyev Posad, of course, is where all this is heading, a town seventy kilometres to the north-east of Moscow and my only excursion outside the capital city. For the hour-long journey, we catch a train from the Yaroslavsky terminal. My son is disappointed that it won’t be one of the newer trains, he says trains to the north-east are the last to be modernized, but it looks fine to me. We will pass through Mytishchi, which my son jokes every visitor to Moscow must go to because a friend of his lives there. We record a short video in which I say what a nice city it is. I see greenery, snaking rivers, houses instead of blocks, lots of tin huts with chimneys poking out of them. I imagine what the scene would look like if it was covered in snow. It’s not as lush as Bulgaria, the climate here is more severe, and the trees are several weeks behind Sofia.

Sergiyev Posad is where the Trinity Lavra of St Sergius is located, Russian Orthodoxy’s spiritual centre. I have wanted to go there for a long time. Not only does it contain the relics of Russia’s most important saint, St Sergius of Radonezh, who lived in the fourteenth century, but the same church that contains his relics houses probably the most famous icon in the world, the Trinity by Andrei Rublev. Russia is famous for three icons: the Trinity; the Vladimir icon of the Mother and Child, which I have seen in the main cathedral in Moscow (at a distance, behind bulletproof glass), a twelfth-century icon sent by the Patriarch of Constantinople to the Grand Prince Yuri Dolgorukiy of Kiev which is said to have protected Moscow from an invasion by Timur in 1395; and the Kazan icon of the Mother and Child, the original of which was lost in 1904 (the robbers were interested in the frame, not the icon itself!), so there are only copies, of which I venerated one on the Kolomenskoye estate, in the church associated with Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, father of Peter the Great, next to the avenue of lime trees and opposite the former site of his wooden palace.

When we arrive in Sergiyev Posad, we walk along the platform and cross the tracks to exit through a barrier. I can glimpse a gold dome in the distance. The town reminds me of a settlement in the Wild West with a main street and not much else. The buildings are ugly, but this is not the point of our visit. We head right, and then left, emerging onto a patch of grass with the Konchura River flowing through it, which offers an attractive view of our destination. My son again takes me a different way, past a memorial of military glory, which really holds little interest for me, until at last I find myself in front of the monastery gate. It is a Sunday, and there is a constant trickle of pilgrims, but nothing overwhelming. I pause for photos in front of the entrance. As we enter, we pass frescoes of St Sergius greeting a flock of doves – his future disciples – and blessing Prince Dmitry Donskoy before he meets the Tatar army at the Battle of Kulikovo, two pivotal moments in the saint’s life, which represent his spiritual authority and legacy.

Inside the enclosure proper, we pass the Dormition Cathedral on the right. There is the grave of an elder, which is recent (beneath wood, not stone) and covered in flowers, attracting the attention of numerous pilgrims, some of whom must have known him when he was alive. We then pass the Church of the Holy Spirit, its white walls blazing for a moment in the light of the sun, which emerges briefly from the clouds, and join the queue outside the Trinity Cathedral to venerate the saint’s relics. The wind is biting, but I do not mind this. Actually I like the fact of waiting. It gives you time to reflect and creates a bond with the people around you. A woman comes out and asks us to queue next to the church wall, not out into the square. We are given books of prayers in Russian to the saint. As often in Russian churches, we will enter the church from the side. I have found entrances in Moscow confusing – you’re never quite sure where they are, and when you do find them, you’re never quite sure which part of the building you are in.

Here, however, on entering the church, we find ourselves in the narthex, candles flaring, those for the living on brass stands that are higher than those for the departed, the metal gleaming where it has been oiled to prevent the wax from sticking. Women busily scrub away, keeping the surfaces clean. The nave is on our left. We turn the corner and, as if entering Noah’s ark, are lined up so that we approach the relics two by two. I’m just glad my son is next to me, and not with someone else. I gaze around, searching for the icon of the Trinity, which I imagine will be in the centre of the church, not on the iconostasis itself, but I am wrong. There is one Trinity to the left of the holy doors, next to the Mother, but I do not think it is this one. To the right of the holy doors, where Christ would normally be… Yes, this is it. I feel certain that this is it, and I sneak a photograph of the image. I know that photography is not permitted, but I also know that Russians love their mobile phones. It is time to turn my attention to the relics, which are in a silver shrine against the wall, to the far right of the iconostasis. A man beckons people forwards, helps them bow, and then urges them on. Orthodoxy is all about movement. People make the sign of the cross. A choir sings – a moleben, perhaps, or an akathist to the saint. The most common words in an Orthodox service are a plea for mercy: “Lord, have mercy.” I am carried forwards, as if on a wave. I see the opening. The face is covered, unlike in Greek churches, where the face is often visible. I bow down and kiss the glass, touch it with my forehead, and kiss it again. I have waited so long for this moment. Already I am descending the steps, back to the nave proper. I do not remember having ascended them. I join the huddle of the choir, turn back in the direction of the relics, I need more time, and begin to pray. And then something very strange happens.

It is as if a channel opens up. I have never experienced anything like this before. It is as if the saint himself is listening. I pray in silence, but feel as if my words are magnified in heaven, are reaching right to God’s throne through the saint’s intervention. I stutter out my prayers, my meagre requests. It is as if I have been asking to see someone important in order to let my thoughts be known, and now I have been given the opportunity, I feel rather flustered. Whereas our words normally form a thread, which may or may not reach its destination, my words now are a thoroughfare, a broad boulevard, a royal road. A link has been enabled between me and heaven, and the one who has done this is lying a few feet in front of me. I know it cannot go on forever and must come to an end. What it would be to enjoy such discourse on a permanent basis! Faith is the enlarging of things. Faith is sight and hearing. So often in this world we feel undervalued, overlooked, when, like the animals in Moscow Zoo, all we want is to be acknowledged – not to engage in trade, not to engage in trickery or deceit, but to be ourselves, fully open. We spend so much time immersed in conflict, but when we meet our own fragility, our own breathlessness, I do not think we have the strength to wish anyone ill. When facing the firing squad in One Hundred Years of Solitude, Arcadio realizes how much he really loved the people he hated most. In death, in fragility, there is no room for hostility.

We leave the church and head back to the frontier town. We eat a pizza in Dodo’s. I cannot stop smiling. This is the perfect conclusion to my visit, and I experience enormous gratitude. Orthodoxy is about endurance, something I think people in the West do not understand. You endure, despite the hardships, the obvious persecution. It is not about convenience. It is about being pushed to the limit, to the edge of time itself, and peering over into the chasm of eternity. A saint who has been dead for 650 years opens up the gate to heaven for me. I feel more alive than I have for ages. And I smile, because my son is opposite me. I am not alone. My life has meaning.

  1. In front of the Trinity Lavra.
  2. St Sergius blessing Prince Dmitry.
  3. The wall of the Church of the Holy Spirit with the Trinity Cathedral on the left.
  4. The queue outside the Trinity Cathedral.
  5. My photo of the Trinity icon, which forms part of the iconostasis in the position normally occupied by Christ.
  6. The Trinity icon in relation to the shrine of St Sergius on the right.
  7. In Dodo Pizza.

Jonathan Dunne

Back to the beginning: Red Square

IV. Moscow Life

The first thing I learn in Moscow is the importance of the metro, which is said to transport ten million people a day. I am given a Troika card, which I can use to travel as much as I like (it costs eight euros for three days). My favourite line is my son’s line, of course – number 9 – and my favourite station is Borovitskaya – right to the heart of the Kremlin. On my first day, I stand on the Bolshoy Kamenny Bridge, the wind blowing down a cold and grey Moscow River, and gaze at the Kremlin towers behind me and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour ahead. The gold dome is under scaffolding. I will visit it later on the same day, but I make the mistake of approaching the side facing the river, imagining that this will be the main entrance, when in fact the main entrance faces the other way. I’m still confused by this – how could you not face the river?

I eat my sandwich and crisps, still in Bulgaria wilderness mode. After this, I will take to having lunch in some of my son’s favourite restaurants. There is no McDonald’s or Kentucky Fried Chicken, but they have been replaced by Russian equivalents: Vkusno i tochka and Rostic’s (which I mispronounce Rustic’s), which are just as good, if not better. The idea that Russia is straining under the weight of western sanctions is quickly dispelled by a visit to the local mall, where the first thing I see is a large, well-lit western clothes store. Other western products are on offer: cosmetics, for example, or shoes. And where such products do not exist, Russians are more than capable of coming up with their own.

Similarly, people on the metro do not look harassed, afraid of being watched. They look quite calm. Most of them are on their phones, but this is not a Russian phenomenon. IPhones abound. Occasionally, you get a woman with a large tome running to more than a thousand pages, Tolstoy perhaps, like a lunchbox on her lap. Younger people read European classics from an attractively produced series. I spot Guy de Maupassant. I get the occasional glance, more curiosity than anything, I’m amazed at the ease with which Alyosha at Sretensky Monastery identifies me as English, but I am just a passing curiosity. My son teaches me to stand aside as the doors open to let the passengers out, there is a bit of pushing and shoving. Escalator etiquette is the same as in London (stand on the right, walk on the left), so I’m not a complete country bumpkin, though I feel like one.

The metro stations are grand. Some of them were built under Stalin – Komsomolskaya is a prime example, with mosaics on the ceiling of generals mustering their troops beneath the banner of Christ or Lenin preaching in Red Square. I have fun taking photographs of my favourite mosaic with St Basil’s Cathedral because it is positioned above the escalator, so I have to keep descending and ascending on the elevator until I think I’ve got a good one. It’s quite hard taking a photograph of the ceiling when you’re travelling upwards. My son waxes lyrical about the station before Vnukovo airport, Pykhtino, where there is a model fighter jet attached to the ceiling above the escalator (again!). The line to Vnukovo airport, 8A, is much more modern.

There are two circle lines: an inner circle line, number 5, and an outer circle line, number 11. Line 5 is remarkably smooth, it feels like travelling on air, and the seats are comfortable, not too close together, divided into groups of two and three, with plugs to charge your phone. Each carriage on the metro is fitted with a screen, which gives information about the new river transport, safety videos for children who get lost (they are to stand beneath a sign on the wall, where they will be spotted by metro staff, who come to reunite them with their parents), videos about places – the Caucasus, Astrakhan – Muscovites might like to visit, a film about the zoo. There are themed carriages – one is devoted to the Bolshoi Theatre – and there is much excitement about Yuri Gagarin because it is the 65th anniversary of his first crewed journey into space aboard Vostok 1 (Vkusno i tochka are offering models of the spaceship with their kiddie menus, and I am tempted to get one). There is a great deal of pride in the country and its achievements, and I don’t think this is a bad thing.

My overriding impression is one of efficiency, of services – public transport, museums, parks – being laid on for Russian citizens to make the most of. There is a sense of order and purpose. The parks are immaculate and extensive. I visit several: Victory Park (dedicated to those killed in the two World Wars and in Nazi concentration camps, as well as to those involved in the clean-up after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster and to hero cities), Zaryadye (next to the Kremlin, with its amphitheatre-like seating and carefully ordered flower beds), Novodevichyi Prudy (next to the famous convent of the same name with its illustrious cemetery), Kolomenskoye (the former royal estate, now open to the public, with its spacious walkway next to the river, perfect for jogging, and a strange bird I am unable to identify, the size of a thrush with a grey hood and round black marks over its eyes like a robber). The buildings in Kolomenskoye are closed – it is a Monday – but the foreman gives me permission to venerate the Kazan icon of the Mother and Child and asks where I am from.

One of my most enjoyable excursions is with my son and a friend to the Arbat district of the city. We pass several buskers. My favourite is a young guy in white trainers, singing a Russian love song – the buskers put out pieces of cardboard with their bank details so you can throw in a few coins on your phone – but there are two energetic violinists playing Vivaldi in an underpass and a guy with an impossibly large balalaika, so large it has to rest on a metal pin. We pass one of Stalin’s wedding-cake buildings, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, take up position next to the river – my son’s friend jokes that the West thinks the fishermen are snipers in disguise – visit the mall next to Kiyevskaya station (more western products or Russian equivalents), and then take the metro across the river (line 4 from Kiyevskaya to Smolenskaya).

Crossing the Moscow River between Kiyevskaya and Smolenskaya.

One of my favourite evenings is my son’s blind date at the operetta house. We go to see Monte Cristo. The street outside is lit with dangling lights. I think I will be bored – after all, I don’t really understand the language, the only word I can make out is “love” – but I am struck by the enthusiasm with which the singers and dancers perform and the audience responds. If I were to stay longer, I would go again – to see Anna Karenina, for example. In the interval, I order an apple juice in Bulgarian (I have decided to speak Bulgarian slowly, rather than English) and get what I want. I walk up and down the stairs, imagining I have a seat in a box or the stalls. At the end of the interval, my son turns up with the young woman in question. He is so grown up, and gallant – bringing flowers to a first date. I press her to drink something, and she orders a tea. My son flashes his debit card before I can reach for my change. I sit in the darkness, while the attendant identifies people who are using their mobile phones by squiggling with a red laser on their screens. The couple in front of me – not my son and his date – have argued, and he is now sitting a couple of seats away. She has to lean across to speak to him, but they still manage to take a selfie in front of the stage at the end of the performance. I wonder if the accompanying music – modern rather than classical – is live or recorded. There is a pit, but it doesn’t seem to house an orchestra, because one or two of the dancers jump into it, and I can’t imagine they’re having to dodge musicians as they land. I’ve lost track of who Monte Cristo is, and I can’t quite remember the story (I know it has something to do with false imprisonment and revenge), but I admire the backflips and savour the romantic melodies. When I take my leave of the young woman – my son is going to accompany her to her metro station, where she will be met by her mother – I clutch her hand. She is uncertain, and I want her to be well. The glass bits in her hair remind me of the lights outside, candles in a Christmas tree, stars that glint in a night sky. I find everything touching, perhaps because I know my time is limited.

  1. The mosaic of St Basil’s Cathedral in Komsomolskaya station.
  2. The model fighter jet above the escalator in Pykhtino station.
  3. Monument to the liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident, Victory Park.
  4. The amphitheatre-like seating in Zaryadye Park.
  5. Moscow City and Novodevichyi Prudy Park.
  6. The Kazan icon of the Mother and Child on the Kolomenskoye estate.
  7. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Borodinsky Bridge.
  8. The lights outside the operetta house.

Jonathan Dunne

Next: A Trip to Sergiyev Posad

III. Moscow Zoo

One of the few places I do not like (I suppose another might be the Expo, known in Russian as VDNKh) is Moscow Zoo. The conditions are not good. I wonder whether zoos should be placed in cities or whether they shouldn’t be in the open countryside, so that it is we who visit the animals’ environment and not the other way around. Some of the animals – large birds like the shoebill – look miserable, and they perform repetitive actions, the panda constantly going backwards along a walkway, the polar bear reaching the end of its pen, turning around, arching its neck in reverse, and then pacing in the other direction. It doesn’t look natural. And how could it? A golden eagle is not meant to be in a cage with a net over it, however tall that cage may be.

The humans behave like apes, and the apes behave like humans – or at least our impression of what their behaviour is. They (the humans) screech and laugh hysterically, chasing each other up the ramp, while the apes sit normally, playing with a sheet, wondering what the fuss is all about. When I approach the zebras, they seem to make up their mind to go outside, but of course they should be on the savannah. I wonder if it isn’t cold in Moscow for a lot of these animals, especially the ones from Africa. The only glimmer of hope is the Baltic grey seals – there is a little interaction with humans, and they swim very gracefully – and the bearded seals, where there is a pup, and again one cannot but be impressed by the gracefulness of these large animals in water. At least they have space to move in, even if it isn’t the open sea.

I am falling into a depression, I can hardly bring myself to take any photographs, and then I notice something. What the animals want is to be seen – not gawped at, not photographed, not pointed at. They do not want to be a source of entertainment, like a television screen. They want to be acknowledged. I suddenly realize that they are looking at me – in the hope that I will see them.

As a race, we are so inclined to view the environment as two-dimensional, as being put there for our entertainment and provision, but it is so much more than that. It has its own intrinsic worth, its own meaning, one we are slow to pick up on, since we believe its sole meaning is to reflect us back to ourselves, to convey our message, to fill our stomachs, to keep us amused. We see the environment, but we do not see it. It is like a picture on the wall, a backdrop to the events of our lives. I wonder how much the verse Genesis 1:28 might have to do with this.

I cannot change the animals’ conditions, I cannot break in at night and free them, transport them back to their natural surroundings. More’s the pity. But I can at least see them. I make a connection with their gaze. I put down my phone. I sympathize with them and understand something of their plight.

All the earth wants is to be seen – not exploited, not fenced in, not traded, but seen. It is we who have to change. And when we do, what we see becomes incomparably richer.

  1. The giraffe.
  2. The lion.
  3. The snowy owl.
  4. The otter.
  5. The Baltic grey seal.
  6. The bearded seal.
  7. The lynx.
  8. The panda.
  9. The dhole.
  10. The polar bear.

Jonathan Dunne

Next: Moscow Life

II. The Tretyakov Gallery

I am not a fan of art galleries – I find them ever so slightly soporific. But not the Tretyakov. I am enthralled. Each new hall – and there are sixty-two of them – reveals a new wonder. I go around, choosing my favourite painting in each room, but soon I have to surpass my limit of one and choose two or three. The paintings go from the eighteenth century (Catherine II’s Victory over the Turks and Tatars) to the mid-twentieth century (these are among my favourites). There are portraits (lots of them), rural scenes, battle scenes, a remarkable and slightly surreal Appearance of Christ to the People by Alexander Ivanov, where the focus is on John the Baptist and the motley crew that have gathered around him (Christ is in the background, and you do not notice him at first). What makes it even more wonderful is the presence in the next hall of the studies the painter carried out for each of the characters in the main painting. They are clearly recognizable. I am touched by Vasily Tropinin, his portrait of a lacemaker (and indeed his self-portrait with the Kremlin behind him). There are portraits of famous writers, from Pushkin to Gogol and Dostoevsky to Chekhov, and composers like Mussorgsky and Tchaikovsky. But my favourite portrait is the magical Girl with Peaches by Valentin Serov, the fruit and cutlery on the table, the plate on the wall, the greenery visible through the window, and the girl’s somewhat nonchalant gaze. She seems to have been captured with ruffled hair before leaping up from her chair to go out into the garden. Serov has a similarly liquid portrait of the last tsar, Nicholas II, and a scene of his happier coronation in the Assumption Cathedral, a bustle of colour and activity, movement and intensity. There is a peacefulness to the Russian countryside (the Russian soul?) – take, for example, The Rooks Have Come by Alexei Savrasov (available as a phone cover in the gift shop) or A Quiet Monastery by Isaac Levitan. There are battle scenes that reflect the futility of war (The Vanquished by Vasily Vereshchagin, with a priest censing the bodies of the dead). Ilya Repin is a master – he is famous for his painting of Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan, the tsar having just dealt his son a fatal blow to the head, but I prefer his portraits (his daughter sitting on a branch). I am very impressed by Nikolai Ge and his religious scenes – the Roman soldiers departing the scene of the crucifixion, almost laughing about it, while unbeknown to them, as the sun rises, an angel hastens to the ensuing resurrection. I am not such a fan of Mikhail Vrubel and his blotchy paintings – they seem to like him – but I do like the twentieth-century representatives: Evening in the Steppe by Pavel Kuznetsov, the humour of A Windy Day by Nikolay Krymov, and Constantinople. Dogs by Martiros Saryan.

Just when I think I cannot take any more, I reach halls 56-62, the end of the exhibition, with all the ancient icons, and my breath is taken away: St Nicholas and the Annunciation, twelfth-century icons from Novgorod; the early fifteenth-century Transfiguration by a painter of the circle of Theophanes the Greek; a King of Glory from my neck of the woods (the Balkans): Christ in Majesty by Dionisius; and then the crème de la crème, Andrei Rublev and his Saviour and Archangel Michael from the Deesis of Zvenigorod. I think my mouth drops open. A Russian looks at me with bemusement. My phone battery is exhausted, so I sit on the bench and contemplate the Saviour for twenty minutes, as he stares lifelike at me from out of the wood of the Trinity.

There are so many paintings to take in. I am struck by Nikolay Bogdanov-Belsky’s Mental Arithmetic, the boys in S. A. Rachinsky’s free school racking their brains to get the answer right, again the intensity of their gaze, the shared effort, the wisdom and patience of old age as the teacher waits for them to work out the equation. And this is an overriding impression in Moscow: it is a city of industry, or better industriousness, people working in concert, it is not a city that is standing still.

I decide against doing anything else that day, the Tretyakov is enough, I drink an Earl Grey tea and eat a Danish pastry, and then head back to my accommodation, my mind full of images, models gazing at me from the canvas.

  1. The Appearance of Christ to the People by Alexander Ivanov.
  2. The Rooks Have Come by Alexei Savrasov.
  3. Mental Arithmetic by Nikolay Bogdanov-Belsky.
  4. The Vanquished by Vasily Vereshchagin.
  5. Portrait of Composer M. P. Musorgsky by Ilya Repin.
  6. Heralds of the Resurrection by Nikolai Ge.
  7. A Girl with Peaches by Valentin Serov.
  8. Evening in the Steppe by Pavel Kuznetsov.
  9. The Transfiguration by a painter of the circle of Theophanes the Greek (early 15th century).
  10. Christ in Majesty by Dionisius (1500).
  11. The Saviour by Andrei Rublev (c. 1400).

Jonathan Dunne

Next: Moscow Zoo

Moscow: A Visitor’s Impressions

I. Red Square

I suppose the place a Westerner visiting Moscow for the first time wants to see most is Red Square. This is probably the only image of Moscow I retained from my childhood. The military parade. Russia as a military threat. Victory Day. But when we left the Revolution Square metro station, my son took me past the statue of Karl Marx, somewhat blinded by the sun, to visit the Bolshoi Theatre. “Bolshoi”, such a resonant term for lovers of ballet, simply means “Big”. Next to it, unsurprisingly, is another theatre called “Small” and an operetta house we will go to a few days later (my son has a blind date, and I am there to chaperone him; actually he mistakenly bought an extra ticket). When I do finally make it into Red Square via the Resurrection Gate next to the History Museum, I find myself in a large, cobbled space with the Kremlin walls to my right, the emblematic St Basil’s Cathedral ahead of me, and a fancy mall on my left. Nestled beneath the Kremlin walls is Lenin’s mausoleum. One cannot help but be struck by the juxtaposition of Christianity and socialism, an impression that is reinforced later by a visit to Zaryadye Park, where on a walkway suspended above the Moscow River one can view the Kremlin (with the Archangel Cathedral clearly visible) and further down the north bank the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour. As if to make the visitor feel even dizzier, each tower of the Kremlin walls is topped by a red star. I learn my first history lesson: Russians commemorate all aspects of their past, they do not try to do away with them, as has happened in Bulgaria, for example, where socialist monuments are dismantled and Dimitrov’s mausoleum was (with some difficulty) razed to the ground.

The walls are not so red, either. They are more russet. I gravitate towards St Basil’s Cathedral, known to the Russians as Pokrovsky Cathedral, a reference to the Virgin Mary’s veil (pokrov) and the protection Ivan the Terrible believed he had received in his successful military campaign against the Kazan Khanate in the sixteenth century, which was the reason for him to erect this church. The Basil in question is not the fourth-century theologian, but a contemporary holy fool who was later buried in the church. The familiar domes, looking like turbans, provide a splash of colour: blue and white, green and white, green and gold, red and green, gold. I pose in front of the church and the monument to Minin and Pozharsky, a butcher and a noble who organized resistance to the Polish invaders another fifty years later (in 1612). This would bring to an end the Time of Troubles and lead to the rise of the Romanov dynasty, which would rule over Russia for the next three hundred years, until the bloody revolution of 1917 and the rise of the Bolsheviks under Lenin.

It is easy to lose one’s sense of direction because the Kremlin is not four-sided, but more of a triangle, so you have the south side facing the river, Red Square to the north-east, and Alexander Garden to the north-west. Inside the Kremlin are four ancient churches: the Assumption, Archangel, and Annunciation Cathedrals, and a smaller Church of Laying Our Lady’s Holy Robe. Here also is the Ivan the Great Bell Tower, a large bell sitting at its feet, a chunk missing – it is difficult to ascend to heaven when you are so heavy – and the Senate. The Kremlin, therefore, far from being military in character, is an enclosure that houses churches built (two by Italian architects) during the Grand Duchy of Moscow. My favourite is the Assumption Cathedral with its towering iconostasis (the icons that hide the altar from view, I notice how in some of the grander Russian churches the iconostasis consists of five levels and reaches all the way to the ceiling, the icons of the second level being particularly large, some of which I will see out of context in the Tretyakov Gallery) and frescoes adorning the columns, ceiling, and walls; the Archangel Cathedral, with its icon of St Michael, prince of the heavenly host, was used by royals to pray for military success, and many of them are buried here, while the Annunciation Cathedral was used as a private chapel.

In the Annunciation Cathedral, a Russian woman is enthusiastically explaining the icons to a group of Asian tourists. The tourists answer her questions with comparable enthusiasm, like excited schoolchildren. The Russian woman is indulgent with them and greets their correct answers with mild expressions of joy. I am waiting to take a photograph of the iconostasis, but the male tourist’s head obstructs my view of the holy doors at the centre of the iconostasis. As they move to the left, a woman comes in and stands in front of the icon of Christ. She leaves, but the Asian group automatically shuffles to the right, again making it impossible for me to gain a clear view. They then exit the church, and I think my moment has come, but just as I am about to press the shutter, they come back in – either they have forgotten something, or a point has to be made more forcefully. I rue having entered the church at the same time as them, if only I had been five or ten minutes later or earlier, but in the end they leave and I get my shot. The Russian woman flashes me a look; she is eyeing me as a prospective student.

That morning, we visit Lenin’s Mausoleum. The queue is not long, and the constant drizzle helps to keep it down. We are not required to buy a ticket, entrance is free (entrance to the Kremlin is 11 euros; the History Museum and St Basil’s Cathedral both cost 20 euros, which I find a bit steep). We pass through security and along the wall, where the ashes of prominent socialists are interred, including the Scottish Arthur MacManus and the American Bill Haywood, before going down some steps and entering the mausoleum proper. A guard indicates that I should put my phone away and not take photographs. We descend some more steps, turn a corner, and there is Lenin in his casket, brightly lit in the surrounding darkness and surprisingly intact after a hundred years. Here is the architect of the 1917 Revolution, the one who promoted and was later pushed aside by Stalin. Stalin is buried outside, along with other leaders, while other prominent socialist-era politicians, such as Khrushchev, Gorbachev, and Yeltsin, are buried in the Novodevichy Cemetery in the south-west of the city. It is difficult to avoid a comparison between Lenin’s embalmed body and the relics of a saint in an Orthodox church, and the impact on Russians must have been similar. There is an aura about him. We pause for a moment before being encouraged by a disembodied voice somewhere in the shadows to move on. As we leave the area, the Spasskaya Tower strikes twelve and follows this up with a jaunty rendition of the Russian anthem. I am not sure what century I am in or what the dominant ideology is meant to be.

  1. Red Square (taken from the third floor of the History Museum).
  2. St Basil’s Cathedral with the monument to Minin and Pozharsky.
  3. The Kremlin walls and the domes inside the courtyard (Annunciation, Archangel, Bell Tower).
  4. The five-tiered iconostasis inside the Assumption Cathedral.
  5. The entrance to Lenin’s mausoleum.
  6. The view along the Moscow River from the Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge.

Jonathan Dunne

Next: The Tretyakov Gallery

Airborne

I have lived

the life I wanted,

done everything

there was for me

to do.

I have sailed on the Nile

on a felucca,

slept on Mount Sinai

with a stone

for a pillow.

I have ridden a camel

and sat around

a Bedouin’s fire,

gazing at the night sky,

the cosmic ash.

I have walked into the temple

at Abu Simbel

and followed the path

of the sun.

I have climbed to the top

of a pyramid,

surveyed the great expanse.

I have entered a tomb

in the Valley of the Kings

and seen its riches.

I have raced across a busy thoroughfare

in Cairo

by keeping in step

with the locals,

and safely reached

the other side.

Now my to-do list

is empty.

I have no ambitions,

I realize the futility

of shadow-boxing

with the world.

I am not going to win.

My only concern, then,

is to care for others,

to let the Spirit

fill my emptiness

and give me wings.

Jonathan Dunne

Sofia, 31 May 2026

Thessaloniki in Flowers

The most common colour of flowers in and around the city of Thessaloniki in Greece is pink-purple, followed by white. Many are native to the Mediterranean basin or, more broadly, to Eurasia, but several are from America (amaryllis, pinklady, pink-sorrel, silverleaf nightshade), there is one from Australia (the wonderfully named crimson bottlebrush, the last of the photos), and perhaps surprisingly there is a whole group from South Africa (Cape Marguerite, sour fig, treasure flower). Flowers are just as widely travelled as we are!

Harmony and Language

In the documentary film “Finding Harmony: A King’s Vision” being released on Friday, His Majesty King Charles III makes the point that we should be living as a part of nature, and not apart from it. We should not see nature as something out there to be exploited, rather we should see ourselves as being interconnected with the rest of nature and reliant on it for our well-being (both physical and emotional). In this short piece, I would like to suggest that language agrees with him.

Let us start by looking at where the idea of separation comes from. You can only see something, such as the environment, as being there to be exploited if you view it as being separate from yourself. If it is a part of you, you won’t want to exploit it. Separation comes from our ability to count. To count something, you must draw a line around it, otherwise you cannot count it. This is why we have uncountable and countable nouns. Uncountable nouns tend to be concepts, things that are too large or woolly for us to comprehend (to draw a line around). Countable nouns are things we can contain – in our imagination, or literally, in a bag or a bottle – and they are preceded by the indefinite article a or an. So, we might have rice and a bag of rice, or milk and a bottle of milk. The first is something that flows constantly, it seems to have no beginning or end; the second is contained (and note that it is the container, the bag or the bottle, that causes so many problems to our environment, it is our drawing a line around something in order to trade in it – in order to count it – that causes pollution).

God is uncountable. He is without limits. He is too large for us to comprehend. In the Creation, recounted in the opening two chapters of the Book of Genesis, what he did in effect was make himself countable. He made individual creatures and a planet for us to live on. Creation is the act of making the uncountable countable.

The name of God in Exodus 3:14 (the name he reveals to Moses at the burning bush) is AM. If we apply the phonetic pair m-n to AM, we get an. Language here – with a simple change brought about by applying a phonetic pair – is showing us how God made himself countable, because the indefinite article precedes countable nouns. Read these two words, AM and an, differently, and you get a man.

Man’s purpose was not to create. That is God’s job. We cannot create out of nothing, we can only give meaning to what already exists. We are not authors, we are translators, since nothing begins or ends with us, things pass through us (and we pass through them).

Read the word man in reverse and add a final e (very common in English), and you get name. This was man’s purpose: to name the creatures (Genesis 2:19). By naming them, he gave them meaning, he said amen to God’s will. All three words – name, mean, amen – have the same letters.

But we can go a different way. If I take a step in the alphabet, from m to l, and add the letter d, from man I get land. This is where man lives (hence the importance of nature). If I apply the phonetic pair d-t and add the letter p, from land I get plant, because this is what man must do in order to eat something, he is reliant on nature in order to survive. And if I add the letter e, I get planet. This is what the planet is for – for man to plant crops. God has given him a home.

But whereas God made us countable in order that we might have free will and make our own choices, we have taken this countability to mean that we can do with other people and things whatever we like. We have abused the relationship. We have put the ego first (not God). This is the relationship that we need to repair.

Exploitation is a result of countability (you cannot exploit something unless it is separate). So, we need to repair this breach, or at least to view it in a different light (as something to be respected, for example).

King Charles III explains how nature works in cycles; language also demonstrates this. We start with a seed. The first thing a seed does is sleep. I have rotated the letter d and added the straight line represented by the letter l. This is what we do in our lives when we are oblivious to our surroundings. That straight line represents the ego (it doesn’t matter whether it is written with a capital I or a lowercase l). Once it is in the ground, the seed dies (front vowels e-i). But it dies in order to bear fruit, to become something bigger (a tree). Nature is showing us the path to be taken by the ego – it must die to itself, to its selfish desires and fears, in order to grow in stature.

The seed puts out first a root and then a shoot. These words are connected (mid-vowels e-o, phonetic pair d-t, alphabetical pair r-s, addition of h). The root divides into two, while the shoot – which, as it appears above ground, looks remarkably like a tooth – becomes a tree and divides into three. The tree puts out branches (it doesn’t remain as a straight line), it grows leaves (to harness the power of the sun) and flowers (to attract insects), and the flowers give way to fruit. Fruit is just root with an f on it, and so we return to the beginning… Language is showing how nature is cyclical (in fact, the word return is in nature).

I think this is what His Majesty, with his attention to the importance of the environment, is encouraging us to do – to return to nature. Not to see ourselves as being cut off from it, but as a part of it, reliant on it not only for our physical needs, but also for our peace of soul. It’s like a neighbour – if you are at odds with your neighbour, how can you live peacefully?

The environment attends to our physical needs (without it, we will not be able to eat and we will die). It is beautiful to look at and it gives us peace. But this is not its ultimate purpose. I believe that nature, the environment, is an example out there for what should be happening in us. We also need to bear fruit, not just nature. We also need to die to our selfish impulses for the greater good, just as a seed does when it sprouts in the ground.

In the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 13, there are two parables that teach us about this. One is the Parable of the Sower. This also is a metaphor out there for something that should be happening in here. A sower goes out to sow. Depending on the ground’s receptivity, the seed takes root or it doesn’t. This is really about our ability to hear the word of the kingdom and, having heard it, to bear fruit in God’s name.

If the earth is a metaphor out there for what should be happening in here, then what is our earth? The answer is very simple. Take the last letter of earth and tack it on the front. You have heart. The heart is the earth where the seed of God’s word has to take root and bear fruit. That is the message – of Jesus in the Gospels, but also of nature.

We have to be able to see and hear in order to bear fruit in God’s name – Jesus places great emphasis on our ability to see and hear – and for this we need to learn humility. The humility to admit that our sight has been imperfect, which ironically is what then enables us to see.

I mentioned the phonetic pair d-t earlier. Add this pair to see and hear. What two words do you get? Seed and heart. Language is telling us that when we see and hear the message of the kingdom, a seed is planted in the earth of our heart and we are enabled, through the intervention of the Holy Spirit, to bear fruit. Nature is a lesson out there for what should be happening in here. When we become spiritually healthy, then we will treat the environment as it deserves.

And just in case we were in any doubt, Jesus provides another example: the Parable of the Tares (again, in Matthew 13). Someone sows good seed – the wheat, the children of the kingdom – but an enemy comes in the night and sows weeds – evildoers. The slaves of the householder ask whether they should remove the weeds, but the householder says to wait until the harvest (the end of time), in case they uproot the wheat as well.

Weed and wheat are connected (phonetic pair d-t, addition of h). They look alike, just as people in society look alike and we cannot always be sure of their intentions. But there is one fundamental difference. There is something that wheat has that a weed doesn’t, and that is ears. Wheat is able to listen.

Nature is an example out there for what should be happening inside us. The seed is the word of the kingdom – to love the Lord your God, to love your neighbour – and that seed should be sown in our heart, just as a physical seed is sown in a field. When this happens, we learn how misguided we have been, we learn humility, and we redirect our priorities towards the kingdom (this is the meaning of repentance, metanoia in Greek). We also bear fruit, just as a tree does. And once we can see, the rest of creation rejoices. It recognizes us for the first time. We establish a relationship that is one of love and care, which is King Charles’s message in his film “Finding Harmony: A King’s Vision”.

Jonathan Dunne

http://www.stonesofithaca.com

Apfelsaft

for my father

The sun set in the glass.

Did you know what was coming

when you crouched under the stairs

and listened to the bombs

drop on London?

Did you know what was coming

when your guardian travelled down

to see you

in the grand surroundings of Christ’s Hospital,

Vaughan Williams’s shock of white hair

in the chapel,

and shuffled off

in the growing darkness

to catch the last train home?

This was love,

wasn’t it?

Did you know what was coming

when you stuck it out

to become an officer

and were put in charge

of men older,

more savvy,

than you were?

Is this when your appreciation

of Bach

began?

Did you know what was coming

when you shared a bedsit

with your mother

and became determined

to better yourself

by listening to all of Beethoven’s symphonies

from the library?

Or when Eddie

took you to the terraces

at Brentford

(“make way,

he’s only a littl’un”)?

Did you know what was coming

when you measured up

to my grandfather

and married Mum

(early colour photos

of us pottering in the garden,

you look dashing in them)?

Clearway Promotions,

Claygate Dramatic Society,

Cancer Research Campaign

– you built yourself up.

You drove us

in the dark

to foreign countries

where they spoke funny languages,

you put us in tents

a stone’s throw from the water

(we would need those stones

to weigh down the corners

when the storm came along).

You took your responsibility

very seriously

and instilled it in us.

You could be bloody-minded

– I wouldn’t have wanted

to cross you –

you grew in stature

and yourself became a Samaritan

to those in need.

You were widely respected,

you were somebody,

an ugly sister, Bob Cratchit,

you had a sense of humour,

and that twinkle never quite

left you.

You liked in the early evening

to stand by the drinks

– yours was a G and T,

Mum’s was a sherry –

and while smoking a Silk Cut

to tell me what was going

through your mind.

It helped you to lay it out,

you were not one to leave things

to chance.

And so,

when we sat on the terrace

overlooking the Black Forest,

you poured sunlight

into my glass.

It was something new,

something I hadn’t tasted before,

and this gave you a great satisfaction.

I don’t know what we talked about,

you probably reminisced about your time

in Germany,

the dunes of Sylt,

but I have glimpsed that sunlight

ever since:

on the ghats of Varanasi,

on a starlit night in the Sinai,

sitting with Bedouins,

in Piornedo,

on a Sunday with a hangover,

on the rocks of Lakatnik.

I will keep it with me

for when the stormclouds gather,

it will be the stones that weigh down

the corners of the tent I inhabit.

And I give you a drop of the golden liquid

for your onward journey.

You have realized now

that the demons are insubstantial,

their only weapon fear

of what doesn’t exist,

and the easiest way

to unravel a knot

is to slice it.

You are breath and water,

creation itself,

the sound God made in the beginning.

You can sing to your heart’s content,

join in the chorus,

as when you sang an aria

from the Messiah

to the doctor

with a sheet over your lips,

except that now you are voice itself,

running water,

a ribbon that God laid

on the earth

to give us life.

Jonathan Dunne

Sofia, 24 December 2025